uhmmm....don;t mean to point you guys wrong but they did and still sell the CC
with a four-bager in them. I ahev never checked out to see if this is mentioned
by dodge but one of the local dealers has a lot full of CC's with the four bager
in them.I have seen several on the road before and when they brought out the 4.7
and made chages a year later to the interior I figured they had stopped making
them this way but when I was there to get some minor work done under warrenty
there on the lot were three of them with the new interior and a door sticker
indicating the 2.5L. I popped the hood and sure enough.......more room and small
engine. The dealer that has alot of them is a different one here in town and
does alot of fleet sales as well as normal sales. They might only be availiable
to certain markets. Who knows but I have seen them and would never have thought
much about it except that I occasionaly see posts here that state otherwise.
Jeff Durling
'01 4x2 QC SLT+
AWyseGuy@aol.com wrote:
> First off.. as a few have already said.. can't have 4 cyl & CC.. not that
> it woudl make much of a performance difference; Dodge just chooses to do it
> that way.. and second.. from the mileage the guys on here get with the 4.7..
> You may as well treat yourself to the V8; it gets almost as good of mileage
> as my little 2.5L does. I barely get 20 MPG. If you want to stop at the
> 3.9 just for the economics of it.. don't feel as though your cheating
> yourself or that you'll ever not have enough truck to do the job.
> Getting a V6 Dakota will keep you happy for just as long as you little Mazda
> did; and if you need to push, pull or carry anything; you've got more truck
> than you think your getting.
>
> Aaron W in AL
>
> 94 RC WS 2.5L 5spd
> 95 RC Sport 2.5L 5 Spd
> 86 Shelby Charger Turbo
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:01:44 EDT