I'm also 500lbs heavier than the '93. It's very possible.
- Bernd
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-dakota-truck@BUFFNET.NET
[mailto:owner-dakota-truck@BUFFNET.NET] On Behalf Of Jeff
Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2001 8:19 AM
To: dakota-truck-moderator@bent.twistedbits.net
Subject: Re: DML: New Track Times For V6
Blown with nitrous?? That would be the only way. 15.7 vs 15.4 is a big
difference. Of course, we wont see any timeslips...
""Bernd D. Ratsch"" <bernd@texas.net> wrote in message
news:000f01c0ef4c$6e7bbd50$040aa8c0@homenet.com...
> A 15.4 @ 89 mph isn't being "full of s--t". My best was a 15.7 @
> 88mph.
>
> - Bernd
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-dakota-truck@BUFFNET.NET
> [mailto:owner-dakota-truck@BUFFNET.NET] On Behalf Of John Burgan
> Subject: Re: DML: New Track Times For V6
>
> Ummm, I saw this truck run two years ago at the DML meet at VMP. Its
> real, believe it. -John
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jeff" <iride2fast@hotmail.com>
> To: <dakota-truck-moderator@bent.twistedbits.net>
> Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 11:51 PM
> Subject: Re: DML: New Track Times For V6
>
>
> > 15.4@89.... excuse my language, buy your FULL OF SHIT. You
> > obviously have never been to a dragstrip in your life.
> >
> > ""greg conner"" <dodgeboy93@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:01:46 EDT