RE: RE: corvette vs ss

From: Stlaurent Mr Steven (STLAURENTS@mctssa.usmc.mil)
Date: Mon Jun 11 2001 - 18:23:30 EDT


Then GM is lying (the usual ploy to sell cars). 00 TA puts out 316 stock?

-----Original Message-----
From: Viper450hpGTS@aol.com [mailto:Viper450hpGTS@aol.com]
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2001 1:02 PM
To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
Subject: Re: DML: RE: corvette vs ss

In a message dated 6/11/2001 1:56:47 PM Central Daylight Time,
STLAURENTS@mctssa.usmc.mil writes:

<< ON C5 Vette the RWHP should much higher than the SS, since the engine on
the
 SS is the older C4 version.
 
>>

Not necessarily true. If the SS has an LS1 (since '98) it can and frequently

does dyno more than the C5s. I've owned both (a '99 C5 and a '00 WS6). When
my C5 was bone stock, it dynoed 304 RWHP while my WS6 say 316 RWHP! With
modifications, the WS6 saw 337 RWHP while the C5 made a measly 312 RWHP.
This
has been the case many many times, at least around here anyways!

James
'01 Black 4.7L RC Dakota Sport (5-speed & 3.92)
'02 Midnight Black Subaru Impreza WRX



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:01:47 EDT