I used to own a 89 Shelby Daytona, it had the intercooled turbo II motor and
was an awesome car but if I were to change anything about it, I would have
preferred it be a RWD instead of FWD. So I say do the turbo motor, I think
you would be one of the first to do it, which would be another cool reason
to do it
Sam South
95 Dak, 5.2L,3.90 LSD,5-speed(Soon to be 360 powered)
14.10@98.05
http://www.twistedbits.net/WWWProfile/dakota/Mt5J8FaDfVCv6/
http://people.mw.mediaone.net/sawcut64/home.html
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tim Comstock" <skatenerd@hotmail.com>
To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2001 7:35 PM
Subject: DML: Turbo or v6
> 88 Dakota, 2.2. Which is my best option weighing ease, gas mileage, and
> performance: A turbocharged 2.2, a v6, or a v8. I'd love to stick in a v8
> but what all would I have to change? Engine, transmission, driveshaft...?
> And what about the others? Any feedback would be nice.
> Tim
> _________________________________________________________________
> Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:01:50 EDT