Re: Turbo or v6

• Next message: Dakota R/T QC: "Re: Re: Jet Chips"
• Previous message: greg conner: "Re: Re: Bitten by performance bug"
• Maybe in reply to: Tim Comstock: "Turbo or v6"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

awwww man. I had that same truck..hehe..88 2.2l 2barrel holley, 5
speed...man..an engine swap would be your best bet. But just remember, v6
dakotas are fairly common, it might be cheaper and alot easier to just buy a
whole new truck..thats what I did ;)

>From: "Tim Comstock" <skatenerd@hotmail.com>
>Reply-To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
>To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
>Subject: DML: Turbo or v6
>Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 23:35:28 -0000
>
>88 Dakota, 2.2. Which is my best option weighing ease, gas mileage, and
>performance: A turbocharged 2.2, a v6, or a v8. I'd love to stick in a v8
>but what all would I have to change? Engine, transmission, driveshaft...?
>And what about the others? Any feedback would be nice.
>Tim
>_________________________________________________________________
>Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
>

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com

• Next message: Dakota R/T QC: "Re: Re: Jet Chips"
• Previous message: greg conner: "Re: Re: Bitten by performance bug"
• Maybe in reply to: Tim Comstock: "Turbo or v6"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:01:50 EDT