Re: Fast and the Furious - thumbs down.

From: Andy Levy (andylevy@yahoo.com)
Date: Sun Jul 01 2001 - 12:35:52 EDT


Nope, I thought Gone in 60 Seconds sucked pretty bad. Glad I rented it
instead of buying or seeing it at the theater, so I only wasted $3.75.

DAK4JLB@aol.com wrote on Sunday 01 July 2001 12:11 pm:

> There were some errors with the cars and so on, and some unbelievable
> parts such as the rig high jacking, but hell, what movie doesn't? Gone in
> 60 seconds was a killer movie all though when it comes to "BS", it slung
> more than it's fair share, but no one bashed it. Now we have a movie with
> more adrenaline pumping action and no one likes it just because it has a
> bunch of crappy slow imports that only run like 10 in the 1/4. The Eclipse
> he had in the beginning only had the 1.8 and same with the hooked up RX-7
> of course, cars like this impress me alot. I'll never own a ricer and I
> hate the paint scheme they had in the movie with the 200lbs of stickers
> but any open minded person would have to agree that it is impressive with
> what they can do with them.
>

-- 
-andy
andylevy@yahoo.com
http://home.twcny.rr.com/andylevy/dakota/
'99 CC 4x4 318 auto



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:02:03 EDT