FWIW, I was always under the impression that the later model years were
always the best for all vehicles but IMHO, I think a 2000 DAK would be
better than a 2001 DAK as the 4.7 engine offers 5 more HP (235HP) and the
gauges are more uselful as they have numeric values -vs- lines on the 2001
models...also the little things such as badges, hood lights, hood
insulation (depending on when built in 2000 and what model), etc, are
included.
Don't get me wrong, I have a 2001 DAK QC built 4/12/01, I love it, but am
slightly dismayed at the things left out that the 2000 models have and
wonder what the 2003s will be missing (or you have to pay extra for) that
come standard with the 2001 models.
On Mon, 9 Jul 2001, fbaker wrote:
> Hello all,
> I am in search for a new vehicle. I have a good idea of the asthetic options
> that I want but I would like some help with powertrain and model year
> selection. I want a 2X4 Auto with a V8, but I am not sure whether I want the
> 4.7 or 5.9L. Is there a year that is generally better in quality and
> reliability than another? Or is there a specific year to stay away from? For
> instance I have heard that there is a shortage of '97 Ram computers... I would
> imagine that the shortage applies to the Dakota's but probably not a reason to
> pass up a good deal on a used Dakota.
>
> Any help would be greatly appreciated. Also, is there any advantage to the V6?
> I have not heard of great mileage savings? Really that depends on driving
> habits...
>
> Any insight on Dakota showing at this weekends upcoming Carlisle show?
>
> Thanks,
> Gus
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:02:04 EDT