RE: Independent Wax Test Redux

From: Kenneth Eng (keng@novadigm.com)
Date: Thu Jul 19 2001 - 15:35:39 EDT


Ron,

Please pay more attention to what you read. Sean posted a link to a website
containing an article on a test that someone else conducted. Sean did not
conduct the test. Also the post from Pierre made no personal attack on
Sean. Unlike yours.

Ken

-----Original Message-----
From: Ron Slakie [mailto:Slakie@erols.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2001 2:50 PM
To: DML
Subject: DML: Independent Wax Test Redux

I am normally just a lurker on this list however, I feel the time has come
to address the great Pierre. Sean posted some information to this list
relative to a wax test he conducted. Pierre has concluded, and rightfully
so, that this test was not conducted using a scientific methodology. Has it
occurred to you Pierre that more than 99% of the advice and information you
see posted to the DML is based upon subjective evaluation and opinion, which
does not meet the scientific methodology criteria. Sean provided some
information which I and I am sure others found useful; I'm sure none of us
consider it thorough or that it is gospel. Sean provided some information
which might be useful to some; about the only information I gleaned from
Pierre's post is that Prince probably has a higher IQ than Pierre and
perhaps he should join the DML. We shouldn't criticize members who try to
provide useful information. If you want to be critical aim it at the
countless non-Dak posts we have dealing with blood and gut pictures as well
as those about the Neon.

Ron
Springfield, VA



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:02:08 EDT