You said it Jon, I wish I had my ole 92 back, only with the handling of my
2k. As far as engines...well, its a toss up for me..the 4.7 is nice on
response and mpg, but the 5.2, busted ass when the pedal went down...I miss
that truck.
Boog!
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jon Smith" <jon@fast4x4.net>
To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 6:35 PM
Subject: Re: DML: Re: Gen II vs. Gen III, on looks alone
> I sure hope those R/T boys like the looks of a Gen II tailgate, especially
> the part that says 4X4 cuz there aint many that have NOT been staring
> at it :-D
> __________________
> Jon Smith
> Raleigh, NC
> '95 CC 318 4x4 auto
> 344rwhp/424tq
>
>
> It's really not a fair comparrison (Jon can back me up on this) How is a
> gen3 owner gonna say his looks better when the only parts of a gen2 he has
> ever seen is the tailgate and rear bumper. Just as us gen2 guys cant have
a
> real opinion on gen3's because the only parts we have ever seen is the
front
> bumper when we look into the rearview at the track...and even that view is
> from a distance...
> just my $.02 hahaha
>
> Greg Conner
> 1993 RC Dakota Sport
> 3.9L 5speed
> 15.4 @89
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:02:53 EDT