Thats what I was goig to point out, I know the 2.5l in my moms 90 shadow was
machined for motor mounts to mount it in a fwd or rwd car, and I could
allmost swear the 2.2l in my 88 dakota was the same, guess ya dont know till
ya check it out.
Greg Conner
1993 RC Dakota Sport
3.9L 5speed
15.4 @89
>From: AWyseGuy@aol.com
>Reply-To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
>To: aol@dakota-truck.net
>Subject: Re: DML: Re: DaProjectII
>Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2001 01:11:08 EDT
>
>In a message dated 10/6/2001 10:45:26 PM Central Daylight Time,
>dougmyers@starpower.net writes:
>
>
> > Hey man... you do know that the FWD 2.2's don't have the provisions to
> > mount RWD, right?
>
>
>I'd noticed that there was a RWD 2.2 block available; and sicne they use
>another block for RWD applications.. why have both my 2.5L Daks come with
>the
>FWD mount attached to the block with simply a cover over it?? did they
>just
>change the back end of the block.. I haven't gotten to put the 2 side by
>side
>for comparisons.
>Aaron W in AL
>
>94 RC WS 2.5L 5spd
>95 RC Sport 2.5L 5 Spd
>86 Shelby Charger Turbo
>
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:03:10 EDT