RE: Re: Caddy Taillights

From: Smokindakota (webmaster@smokindakota.com)
Date: Sun Nov 04 2001 - 02:53:31 EST


To be different. Although I think that the caddy taillight conversion is too
common nowadays. Go for something different. Maybe a set of Acura euro tails
in the roll pan instead of the common supras. Or just put a set of leds in
the roll pan. We just did that to the 2 door excursion that
totallypolished.com did for SEMA. You can paint and clear coat them so you
can't even see them untill you hit the brakes or parking lights. Looks
sweet. I will have pics of SEMA up by Monday.

Steven

http://www.smokin-graphics.com
http://www.smokindakota.com
http://www.soundofprestige.com
ICQ 42763370
AOL IM - SMKNDAKTRK

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net
[mailto:owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net]On Behalf Of Tom Slick North
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 7:08 PM
To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
Subject: DML: Re: Caddy Taillights

Question, why put GM Cadillac style tailights on a Dodge?

Later,
Tom "Slick"
"So I'm a purist....somewhat."

----- Original Message -----
From: "Kathy and/or Chris Carton" <carton@madriver.com>
To: "DML" <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 7:56 PM
Subject: DML: Caddy Taillights

> Yep.
>
> www.cruznlo.com
>
>
> Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2001 20:56:57 -0500
> From: "greg conner" <dodgeboy93@hotmail.com>
> Subject: Re: DML: Caddy Taillights
>
> Thanks Chris, So the stock set up supplied enough power for the lights?,
it
> was just splice and go?
>
> Thanks Greg Conner
> 1993 RC Dakota Sport 3.9L 5speed
> 15.4 @89
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:03:27 EDT