Isn't the 4.7 cast iron block with aluminum heads??????
>>> jim76712@swbell.net 12/09/01 12:44AM >>>
You are not looking at all the specs. See at which rpm the maximum torque
and hp is developed on each engine. You may find more stump pulling power
in the 5.9 but better fuel economy in the 4.7. It all depends what you want
to do with the truck. Light duty driving or trailer pulling. Also I don't
know how many 4.7s have been around to go more than 200k miles but lots of
5.9s have! Also when it is time to rebuild, how many times can you rebuild
the aluminum engine compared to the cast iron one? I have a friend with a
85 ram crew cab with over 300k on his 5.9 and it is still usable. I am told
that the 4.6 aluminum Ferd V8 is a throw away and cannot be rebuilt. do we
know about the aluminum Dodge engines? I am not being critical just
answering some questions that are asked here!
Jim in Waco
99 R/T Cast iron 5.9, 2001 Grand Cherokee, Aluminum 4.7, 96 Cougar,
aluminum 4.6.
bob wrote:
> A friend of mine might be buying the new 1500 Ram. He is asking me why
> someone would want the 5.9 over the 4.7 when the HP of both is the
> same?? And the tourqe of the 5.9 is only 35#'s higher. Could someone
> explain this for me?
> Thanks
> Bob
>
> --
> Lowered 1998 Metallic Red Extended Cab
> 2/4" Drop, Gibson Cat Back, Street Scene Roll Pan, Shaved Tailgate, Lund
> Wiper Cowl, S/S Sport Mirrors, Lo-Pro Hard Tonnue over a Custom Bed, 13"
> Video System, K&N, F&B, TB, Stillen Bumper Cover, Nitto 275's all around
> on Chrome R/T Wheels, Sony CDX-7850, Three sets of Infinity Kappa's,
> Three MTX 275x's, MTX Thunderform with 10" 7000's and a MTX 2130.
>
> New Pictures "by Chuck" at http://www.intense99dak.com/bob.htm
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:03:40 EDT