4x4 QC - 4.7 and 5.9

From: r_meredith_jr@yahoo.com
Date: Mon Dec 10 2001 - 23:10:29 EST

Next message: r_meredith_jr@yahoo.com: "4x4 Graphite QC Dak Pics"
Previous message: Tim Althoff: "RE: High-mileage dakotas??"
In reply to: Jeff Trithart: "Re: High-mileage dakotas??"
Next in thread: Will Coughlin: "Re: 4x4 QC - 4.7 and 5.9"
Maybe reply: Will Coughlin: "Re: 4x4 QC - 4.7 and 5.9"
Reply: Joe: "Re: 4x4 QC - 4.7 and 5.9"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

What type of gas mileage are you guys getting with either of these combos?
I'm trying to decide upon the engine also. I like the 4.7 (I have that
right now) but am unsure of longevity - BUT - my dad has a 360 in a RAM and
it has 260k on it, NO problems as of yet, a rough idle that is it... ;-)
Which of the two trannies (AUTO) do you guys think will last longer with
this weight vehicle, torque of the engines?

-robert

Next message: r_meredith_jr@yahoo.com: "4x4 Graphite QC Dak Pics"
Previous message: Tim Althoff: "RE: High-mileage dakotas??"
In reply to: Jeff Trithart: "Re: High-mileage dakotas??"
Next in thread: Will Coughlin: "Re: 4x4 QC - 4.7 and 5.9"
Maybe reply: Will Coughlin: "Re: 4x4 QC - 4.7 and 5.9"
Reply: Joe: "Re: 4x4 QC - 4.7 and 5.9"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:03:40 EDT