Re: LUND Roll pan question was: Here we go again! was: gen II body style

From: Thomas Vacchino (tommyv@thecia.net)
Date: Sat Dec 22 2001 - 20:39:49 EST


Greg:
Are you going to drill into the sides of the pan and mount them on either side
of the plate?
I couldn't find anything that was small enough to mount on the LUNDS thin
profile.
Stay away from the Billet lighted License plate, it sucks!

"psychonaut"

greg conner wrote:

> I have the same pan also on my 96...(well its not on yet rather in the
> closet) I bought a set of bolts with little lightbulbs in them designed to
> light up a license plate...got them from summit for like 24 bucks,,hope they
> work
>
> -greg
>
> >From: Thomas Vacchino <tommyv@thecia.net>
> >Reply-To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> >To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> >Subject: Re: DML: LUND Roll pan question was: Here we go again! was: gen II
> >body style
> >Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2001 09:30:46 -0500
> >
> >OK , OK I give already!..........Gen II stated in '91.
> >Now stop picking on me, or I'll get my big brother to beat ya up ;-)
> >
> >Hey Mark, I noticed you have the same LUND roll pan on your DAK as I do.
> >Question, what are you using to light you license plate?.....I'm looking
> >for another way to light mine, but the LUND doesn't give you much depth
> >for mounting light into it.
> >I'm using a license plate holder with lights in it, but it's really
> >crappy and I'm constantly replacing the bilbs in it.
> >
> >"psychonaut"
> >
> >Mark Kuzia wrote:
> >
> > > Gen II body started in 1991, magnum engines started in 1992.
> > >
> > > Mark Kuzia
> > > flyboy01@mediaone.net
> > > http://people.mw.mediaone.net/flyboy01/home.html
> > > 1995 Dakota 13.79 @ 102.45 mph "Fastdak"
> > > ~360ci, 5-spd, 8 3/4 rear / 3.90-SG
> > > 1994 Dakota 15.36 @ 91.56 mph
> > > ~318ci, 5-spd, 3.90 LS (bone stock, no mods)
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Thomas Vacchino" <tommyv@thecia.net>
> > > To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
> > > Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 7:25 AM
> > > Subject: Re: DML: gen II body style
> > >
> > > > 1992
> > > >
> > > > "psychnaut"
> > > >
> > > > JAMEPC@aol.com wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > What year did the gen II body style start?
> > > > > Thanks
> > > >
> >
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos:
> http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:03:43 EDT