Re: LUND Roll pan question was: Here we go again! was: gen II body style

From: Thomas Vacchino (tommyv@thecia.net)
Date: Sun Dec 23 2001 - 10:49:25 EST


Well that's two votes for the Summit Bolt Lights!........guess I found my new
license plate lights!
Thanks Mark & Greg....................Merry Christmas!!!!

"psychonaut"

Mark Kuzia wrote:

> I'm using the Summit bolt lights. I have had them for two years now and they
> still work great. See the opening pic on my page.
>
> Mark Kuzia
> flyboy01@mediaone.net
> http://people.mw.mediaone.net/flyboy01/home.html
> 1995 Dakota 13.79 @ 102.45 mph "Fastdak"
> ~360ci, 5-spd, 8 3/4 rear / 3.90-SG
> 1994 Dakota 15.36 @ 91.56 mph
> ~318ci, 5-spd, 3.90 LS (bone stock, no mods)
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Thomas Vacchino" <tommyv@thecia.net>
> To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
> Sent: Saturday, December 22, 2001 9:30 AM
> Subject: Re: DML: LUND Roll pan question was: Here we go again! was: gen II
> body style
>
> > OK , OK I give already!..........Gen II stated in '91.
> > Now stop picking on me, or I'll get my big brother to beat ya up ;-)
> >
> > Hey Mark, I noticed you have the same LUND roll pan on your DAK as I do.
> > Question, what are you using to light you license plate?.....I'm looking
> > for another way to light mine, but the LUND doesn't give you much depth
> > for mounting light into it.
> > I'm using a license plate holder with lights in it, but it's really
> > crappy and I'm constantly replacing the bilbs in it.
> >
> > "psychonaut"
> >
> > Mark Kuzia wrote:
> >
> > > Gen II body started in 1991, magnum engines started in 1992.
> > >
> > > Mark Kuzia
> > > flyboy01@mediaone.net
> > > http://people.mw.mediaone.net/flyboy01/home.html
> > > 1995 Dakota 13.79 @ 102.45 mph "Fastdak"
> > > ~360ci, 5-spd, 8 3/4 rear / 3.90-SG
> > > 1994 Dakota 15.36 @ 91.56 mph
> > > ~318ci, 5-spd, 3.90 LS (bone stock, no mods)
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Thomas Vacchino" <tommyv@thecia.net>
> > > To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
> > > Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 7:25 AM
> > > Subject: Re: DML: gen II body style
> > >
> > > > 1992
> > > >
> > > > "psychnaut"
> > > >
> > > > JAMEPC@aol.com wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > What year did the gen II body style start?
> > > > > Thanks
> > > >
> >



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:03:43 EDT