Then with this wisdom, please explain how I gained 19RWHP without
changing anything but adding this box and replacing the factory (120-day
old) O2 sensor with theirs (4-Wire)?
- Bernd
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net
[mailto:owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net] On Behalf Of Shane Moseley
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 5:30 AM
To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
Subject: DML: Re: Hyper Speed Controller
"Bernd D. Ratsch" wrote:
> The charts were WOT runs for HP and TQ figures....but as I said, the
> A/F was around 15.xx across the normal light throttle rpm band.
The chart was indeed WOT runs then. So your stating one thing but
providing data to support another condition entirely? I'm confused.
Considering that the PCM is only in closed loop under cruise type
conditions, and that the O2 sensor is ignored under open loop - then
this device is doing nothing under open loop if all it does is modify
the O2 sensor signal seen by the PCM.
> The factory O2 sensor is also replaced with the one included in the
> kit.
How many wires are going to it? If less than 5 - it is a narrow band
sensor. Also a wide-band sensor w/associated electronics to drive
charge pump and provide a voltage out is normally selling for
$1000-$4000. Sounds alot like its a narrow-band sensor.
> Snake-Oil?? Hehehe...explain the CARB EO# (minimum $10K for this),
> the HP gains, and the performance gains?
CARB EO# does not prove that the device actually helps the situation, it
only proves that it shouldn't hurt the situation according to their
testing. I could get a CARB EO# for the "Helix PowerSpacer" if I wanted
to waste money.
Latr,
Shane
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:03:52 EDT