I'm just saying to make sure the valve doesn't clip the block, and that
there is enough clearance. The valve checking thing is mandatory as well if
going to a larger cam.
TonyC
-----Original Message-----
From: Wisotzkey, Rich <Rich.Wisotzkey@gd-ns.com>
To: 'dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net' <dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net>
Date: Saturday, March 16, 2002 10:02 PM
Subject: DML: RE: Re: 2.02 valves on 5.2 motor
>
>I pretty much agree with this statement except I'd try notching the pistons
>if required. I think you'll find that works better. :'B
>Rich - Ashburn, VA
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: TonyC [mailto:acellan1@tampabay.rr.com]
>Sent: Saturday, March 16, 2002 8:00 PM
>To: dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net
>Subject: DML: Re: 2.02 valves on 5.2 motor
>
>
>
>will work, but you may have to notch the cylinders for clearance.
>TonyC
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Pukeloser@aol.com <Pukeloser@aol.com>
>To: dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net <dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net>
>Date: Saturday, March 16, 2002 7:32 PM
>Subject: DML: 2.02 valves on 5.2 motor
>
>
>>
>>Does anyone have any experience with putting heads with 2.02 intake valves
>on
>>a 318?
>>I am doing a stroker motor project and will want the R/T heads with 2.02
>>intake valves fo the 408 motor but was wondering id they would work ok on
>my
>>318 'til the stroker is done. Some say that I'll lose low end response but
>>I'm hoping that the top end power will make up for it.
>>
>>John S
>>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:04:09 EDT