About 600-650CFM for a 360 revving at 5200rpm (very mild modifications).
With Cam, Heads, Intake, Exhaust, 700-750CFM would be better.
- Bernd
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net
[mailto:owner-dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net] On Behalf Of Dave
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 9:21 PM
To: dakota-truck-moderator@bent.twistedbits.net
Subject: DML: Re: RE: X-Stream top...worth it or not?
You wouldn't happen to know the requirements for the 5.9L, would you?
I'm gonna get under the hood tomorrow, see what I can fit, if I can get
a 3.5" or 4" filter in there, I'll do that, not sure how much space I
have.
-Dave
""Bernd D. Ratsch"" <bernd@texas.net> wrote in message
news:000001c1effc$ce142bb0$090aa8c0@homenet.com...
>
> The filter will only take in as much as the engine needs. Always make
> sure you're at least 200-300CFM above the actual engine requirements
> for filtration efficiency.
>
> - Bernd
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net
> [mailto:owner-dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net] On Behalf Of Dave
> Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 9:02 PM
> To: dakota-truck-moderator@bent.twistedbits.net
> Subject: DML: X-Stream top...worth it or not?
>
>
>
> Ok, I'm gonna go with a 14x3 open element and remove the weather
> stripping, cheapest option till I can get my Shaker hood. My question
> is this, would the K&N X-Stream be too much air? Is just the 14x3 K&N
> filter enough flow for my stock 5.9L? Cause if that's enough flow, I
> found a red anodized lid that will look pretty good :)
>
> --
> Dave
> Bensalem, PA
> '02 R/T RC Flame Red
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:04:26 EDT