Re: RE: Re: Hehehehehe....yeah...riiiiiiiiiiight

From: kevin reimer (kwreimer@msn.com)
Date: Mon Jun 10 2002 - 21:26:19 EDT


Sounds like they really want to sell this truck, Make em a offer ;)
----- Original Message -----
From: John Neff <jndneff@texas.net>
To: DML <dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net>
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 2:59 PM
Subject: DML: RE: Re: Hehehehehe....yeah...riiiiiiiiiiight

>
> Thought everyone would like to see the responce from the seller of this
> truck.
>
> John
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Matt Boom" <mboom@johnsonautoplaza.com>
> To: <jndneff@texas.net>
> Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 2:19 PM
> Subject: RE: Question for seller -- Item #1833437779
>
>
> > Thanks for the question and interest. The owner of the vehicle is the
> Service Manager at our dealership. He installed the 5.9L himself. He has
> another Dakota that he did the same thing to and both are as fast as
> lightning. The engine came from a 1998 Dodge Ram 1500 with less than
10,000
> miles on it. Total the engine has about 17,000 miles on it between both
> trucks! Even the engine specification under the hood has been changed to
> resemble a 5.9l. The owner has not skipped over one thing or spared one
> expense on this truck. If you have any more questions on the vehicle
please
> feel free to contact me! You are a very knowledgeable Dakota guru to have
> noticed. It is impossible to not like this truck. Trust me I have driven
> it. I will check on the transmission.
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Matt Boone
> > Johnson Auto Plaza
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: jndneff@texas.net [mailto:jndneff@texas.net]
> > Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 10:01 AM
> > To: Matt Boom
> > Subject: Question for seller -- Item #1833437779
> >
> > Hello,
> > I see that this truck is listed as having a 5.9L engine in it. Since we
> all know that this engine was not available in the Dakota until late '98,
> could you please provide me with a brief history of the engine and what
> vehicle it came out of. Also, what parts were used to build it? What
> transmission was used for the swap? Stock 44RE or 46RE?
> >
> > Thank you,
> > John
>
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:04:44 EDT