>With Dodge...ya never know if you got the correct parts out of the bin
>at the assembly plant.
No arguments there. I'm sure the tolerance margin on a part like this is
probably pretty high.
>However, going by this quote from that post: "Makes you want to run out
>and spend $400.00 on some heavily marketed roller rockers, NOT."...it's
>obvious that the person doesn't seem to understand the difference
>between stamped steel (non-adjustable) and roller fulcrum/tip
>(adjustable) rockers.
I don't know the guy so I have no idea what his knowledge level is. I think
I'd have to give him the benefit of the doubt that he knows the difference
between adjustable and non-adjustable rockers. His point was that the stock
rockers were not what DC claims they are.
>Remember, the Viper rockers are 1.7:1 and look almost identical to the
>1.6:1 rockers in the Magnums...and yes, swapping to 1.7:1 rockers DOES
>make a difference, to the tune of 18-20RWHP.
Hey, again, no arguments from me. I personally have not heard of anyone who
has not had a noticeable gain in power from 1.7's, though the guy claims he
has. I just thought the guys statements were interesting and wondered if
anyone had actually measured the stock rockers vs. some of the aftermarket
sets.
John
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:05:04 EDT