Ron,
You're probably right, but would you make up the price difference between
a soft ($200-$250) and hard ($600-$1000) cover in saved gas over the
life of the truck?
At that point, it's more about convenience and looks.
Ronald Wong wrote:
> For less drag I believe the hard tonneau is better.
>
> Ron
> 00 PB SLT QC 4X2 5.9 46RE 3.92 LSD
> For modifications see my DML Profile (URL follows)
> http://www.twistedbits.net/WWWProfile/dakota/Kw9pV1EkFeOYY
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net
> [mailto:owner-dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net]On Behalf Of Jack Snodgrass
> Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 11:51 AM
> To: dakota-truck-moderator@bent.twistedbits.net
> Subject: DML: tonneau question - soft -vs-hard
>
>
>
> I'm thinking of getting a tonneau to improve my
> gas mileage. I do about 350 miles per week and want
> to get a few more MPG if possible. As far as MPG goes...
> does it matter if I go with a soft tonneau? I'm
> looking to save cost and figure that a soft tonneau
> is cheaper.
>
> Thanks - jack
-- -andy andylevy@yahoo.com Maintainer, DML FAQ - http://www.dakota-truck.net/faq/ http://home.twcny.rr.com/andylevy/dakota/ '99 CC 4x4 318 auto
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:05:05 EDT