Nah...you'll be fine.
- Bernd
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net
[mailto:owner-dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net] On Behalf Of Gary Hedlin
Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 6:41 PM
To: dakota-truck-moderator@bent.twistedbits.net
Subject: DML: Re: RE: RE: ATF +3
Ummm..... I just changed mine using ATF+3. With a trans with 140,000
miles on it, should I go witth +4 next time I change it?
Gary Hedlin
"The Crazy Quadraplegic"
ghedlin@theramp.net (business)
ragingquad@yahoo.com (personal)
**Also Webmaster For**
http://garyhedlin.com
http://socaldakota.com
http://scsilverdak.com
http://assistivetechnologies.com
...And Many More!
""Bernd D. Ratsch"" <bernd@texas.net> wrote in message
news:000501c243a3$921a1bb0$090aa8c0@homenet.com...
>
>
> TSB#: 21-006-01
>
> NOTE :THIS BULLETIN APPLIES TO ALL VEHICLES EQUIPPED WITH CHRYSLER
> AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSIONS EXCEPT 1999 AND EARLIER MINIVANS.
>
> DISCUSSION:
> A new transmission fluid (ATF+4(R) - Type 9602) has been developed and
> is being used as factory fill for all vehicles with Chrysler automatic
> transmissions. Until now, vehicles originally filled with ATF+2 or
> ATF+3 were to be serviced with ATF+3. Effective immediately, it is
> recommended that all vehicles with Chrysler automatic transmissions
> except for 1999 and earlier minivans be serviced with ATF+4(R). ATF+3
> should continue to be used for 1999 and earlier minivans because of
> the potential for torque converter shudder during break in. For all
> other applications the
> ATF+4(R) fluid offers significant benefits as outlined below.
>
> NOTE :ATF+4(R) MUST ALWAYS BE USED IN VEHICLES THAT WERE ORIGINALLY
> FILLED WITH ATF+4(R).
>
> NOTE :SERVICE INTERVALS DO NOT CHANGE. THE SERVICE INTERVAL CURRENTLY
> IN EFFECT FOR A GIVEN VEHICLE SHOULD CONTINUE TO BE FOLLOWED.
>
> NOTE :ATF+4(R) IS COMPATIBLE WITH ATF+3 AND CAN BE USED TO TOP OFF
> VEHICLES THAT CURRENTLY HAVE ATF+2 OR ATF+3. DO NOT USE ATF+2 OR ATF+3
> TO TOP OFF VEHICLES THAT HAVE ATF+4(R) FLUID.
>
> BENEFITS
> ^ Better anti-wear properties
> ^ Improved rust/corrosion prevention
> ^ Controls oxidation
> ^ Eliminates deposits
> ^ Controls friction
> ^ Retains anti-foaming properties
> ^ Superior properties for low temperature operation
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net
> [mailto:owner-dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net] On Behalf Of Al & Jeanna
> Figols
> Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 5:28 AM
> To: Dakota list
> Subject: DML: RE: ATF +3
>
>
> I just went through all of this just recently with my multispeed
> (45rfe). I'm assuming your's is a '00, because in '01 they went to
> ATF+4. According to the Dodge shops I spoke to, ATF+3 is still the
> fluid to use if your tranny originally calls for it and all you're
> doing is changeing the filters(there's 2 filters in the 45rfe) and
> approx 6 quarts of fluid that comes out with them. ATF+4 is a
> synthetic fluid that is used in most Chrysler trannys from '01 and up.
> The idea is to lower tranny temp and extend service intervals. If
> your tranny calls for ATF+4, then stick with that. You can use ATF+4
> in a tranny that calls for ATF+3, but unless you're getting the full
> flush service, where they completely flush all of the approx. 14
> quarts of fluid from the tranny and converter, then you're wasting
> your money and will get no added benefit. I finally just changed my
> fluid and filters on my '00 Quad Cab with 38K miles just the other
> day. I tow a car trailer with it alot and figured it would look
> pretty dirty. You know, the tranny and fluid were absolutlely clean!!
> Very minimal filings on the magnet. I guess there's an advantage to
> not having bands in the transmission. Al
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:05:14 EDT