Re: No modified exhaust in NJ

From: srp@cox.net
Date: Thu Aug 22 2002 - 13:09:01 EDT


Ah... I think you should mention SEMA would like to know why an aftermarket exhaust fails you--- Gibson should back you on that-- there's a law/bill/whatever that governs aftermarket parts manufacturers-- and that should protect you.

Sam

>
> From: "Kenneth Eng" <keng@novadigm.com>
> Date: 2002/08/22 Thu PM 12:26:58 EDT
> To: dakota-truck-moderator@bent.twistedbits.net
> Subject: DML: No modified exhaust in NJ
>
>
> Yesterday I took my 98 Dak with a Gibson Split rear exhaust system in to the
> NJ DMV for inspection. The DMV failed me for having a "modified exhaust"
> system. I then went to speak to a manager about why a modified exhaust
> system would cause a failure. I was told that if it isn't a stock looking
> or stock sounding exhaust system it is reason for failure. They did not say
> I failed because it was too loud but because it was an aftermarket exhaust
> system.
>
> I then went to a couple private inspection stations and they all told me
> that in order for them to pass me I should put back on my stock system.
> Good thing I kept the stock system.
>
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:05:16 EDT