"Jon" <jon@dakota-truck.net> wrote in message
news:Pine.LNX.4.21.0210041013260.3877-100000@bent.twistedbits.net...
> In general, digital pictures are not acceptable unless they are of
VERY
> VERY high quality - the resolution of most digital cameras is just not
high
> enough, and the compression tends to cause problems with the picture when
> blown up to the full size. So, unless you had to take out a second
mortgage
> on your house to buy your digital camera, its best to just use a 35mm.
> (If you don't have one, a popular option in the past has been to buy a
> disposable.)
Like Jon said, that's "in general". For the 2002 calendar, I know the July
photo (Neil) was digital and I think the May picture (Jason) is also
digital, taken with my Canon Powershot G1 3.34MP in super-high quality mode
at full res. If you've got a good camera, you can pull it off.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 06 2004 - 11:47:16 EST