Re: Re: 2003 DML Calendar

From: Chris Reck (Roadkill47@attbi.com)
Date: Fri Oct 04 2002 - 15:10:34 EDT


I have a 4MP HP Camera that takes 9x12 pictures... If anyone in the
Chicagoland area wants a picture taken, let me know!

--
Thanks!

Chris Reck Chicagoland, IL

'99 Dakota Sport + CC 4x4 V6 (Deep Amethyst) Custom K&N 6x9 air intake, Rancho RSX shocks, Pioneer full audio system, more to come...

""Andy Levy"" <andylevy@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:ankmd9$7ca$1@bent.twistedbits.net... > > > "Jon" <jon@dakota-truck.net> wrote in message > news:Pine.LNX.4.21.0210041013260.3877-100000@bent.twistedbits.net... > > > In general, digital pictures are not acceptable unless they are of > VERY > > VERY high quality - the resolution of most digital cameras is just not > high > > enough, and the compression tends to cause problems with the picture when > > blown up to the full size. So, unless you had to take out a second > mortgage > > on your house to buy your digital camera, its best to just use a 35mm. > > (If you don't have one, a popular option in the past has been to buy a > > disposable.) > > Like Jon said, that's "in general". For the 2002 calendar, I know the July > photo (Neil) was digital and I think the May picture (Jason) is also > digital, taken with my Canon Powershot G1 3.34MP in super-high quality mode > at full res. If you've got a good camera, you can pull it off. > >



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 06 2004 - 11:47:16 EST