Er, the Neon weighs a lot less and is rated at 215hp and 240tq, but it dyned
223HP and 24X TQ to the FW as I understand! hat means it prolly has about
250HP at the crank compared to the Rex only 227. Add in it's lower weight
and even with FWD, it should easily blow by the Rex by the end of the 1/4.
-Ryan
99 DA RC R/T
Only schmoes need AWD to go fast! :)
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net
[mailto:owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net]On Behalf Of Mr. Plow
Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 11:40 AM
To: dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net
Subject: Re: DML: O/T: SRT-4 beats wrx!
I'm not one to read the SCC mag, but i have a pretty seriuos problem
believing that the Neon beat the WRX. First off, the Rex has 227 ponies,
and i think the Neon was going to be around 180ish correct??
Even more troublesome is the fact that the Rex has AWD, and this system
launches the car HARD and very, very fast.
Other than that, i can't really coment as i haven't read the article.
I don't suppose that you have a link to the article Punch??
The Adam Blaster
Two words, figure it out.....
>
>sport compact car magazine, does a test the srt-4 betas the wrx in 1/4 mile
>times, and 0-60 times.
>
>hmm and I want a wrx, but now I'm not sure!
>
>Punch
_________________________________________________________________
Unlimited Internet access for only $21.95/month. Try MSN!
http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/2monthsfree.asp
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 06 2004 - 11:47:19 EST