Re: Re: RE: No Heat?

From: Jim Miller WB5OXQ (wb5oxq@grandecom.net)
Date: Fri Dec 06 2002 - 09:35:05 EST


It is the opinion of the experts on the dml that 180 is better for
performance and helps reduce the likelyhood of cracked heads which are
common on magnum engines. I went to a GM electronics school about 6 years
ago and the instructors told us the same about emissions. You will never
find me using a 195 in my Mopar ever. By the way have you worked in a
radiator shop for 29 years like I have?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jon N. Benignus" <blkwidow1@primary.net>
To: <dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net>
Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 1:38 AM
Subject: Re: DML: Re: RE: No Heat?

>
> > 195 thermostats sre only to reduce emissions. Until smog
> > rules came out NO cars had more than a 180 degree thermostat and many
used a
> > 160.
> I hate to disagree, but I must.
> I've driven Dodges and Plymouths since 74, and my 65 Sports Fury called
for
> a 192 deg stat. So did Dad's 66 Coronet and 70 Challenger, my 72 and 73
> Chargers. No real smog stuff on those. Heck his 57 and 59 Furys called
for
> a 192. I've not seen a MoPar that DIDN'T call for a 192, unless it was for
> extreme/ racing use.
>
> Jon
> STL MO
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 06 2004 - 11:48:13 EST