At 05:45 PM 2/12/2003 -0800, you wrote:
>Well I feel kinda dumb now for having worried about the emmissions. In
>case you just joining, I'm testing a 2000 non-cali 4.7L in California. It
>is a cold and wet day here too, so the emmissions still could have been
>better, but here they are:
>
>------------|%CO2--|%O2--|HC (PPM)-----|CO(%)----------|NO (PPM)-----|--
>Test---RPM--|Meas--|Meas-|Max-Ave-Meas-|Max--Ave--Meas-|Max-Ave-Meas-|Results
>15mph--1708-|15.20-|0.02-|45--8---2----|0.57-0.02-0.00-|482-82--0009-|Pass---
>25mph--1718-|15.13-|0.00-|28--6---3----|0.70-0.02-0.00-|735-74--0005-|Pass---
Indeed -- looks like you passed with flying colors. Now I won't have to
worry about passing my California model at all ;)
-Bill
-- Bill Pitz <dakota@billpitz.com> '00 Dakota CC SLT 4x4 4.7L V8, 3.92lsd, Flowmaster 50 series
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 06 2004 - 11:45:50 EST