We try to keep it on the DL because nobody believes us.....
-- -Josh 2000 Dakota CC 3.9L"Ed McCarrick" <edmccarrick@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:20030320135209.95600.qmail@web13008.mail.yahoo.com... > > Hey all, > > Thanks to all who responded. I just had never heard > of anyone who has had any good luck with their stock > brakes. > > Ed > --- DakotaPU93@aol.com wrote: > > > > I have a 93 5 speed DAK. I was able to get 118K out > > of my front brakes and > > now I have ~70K on my 2nd set and they seem fine. > > My rear brakes are the > > originals with > > about 185K on them! I do mostly highway driving and > > downshift to stop. > > When I had my fronts replaced the shop tried to talk > > me into new rotors and I > > told them no. I havent had any noise or > > shaking/pulling problems. Its like > > their brand new. > > Kev > > > > > > In a message dated 3/19/2003 10:34:23 AM Eastern > > Standard Time, > > edmccarrick@yahoo.com writes: > > > > > I need an opinion. I just took my 2K QC 4.7 5 > > speed > > > w/ 48K miles, into my dealer to have my clutch fan > > > replaced and had them check the brakes. The > > brakes > > > are still the originals, and the service manager > > told > > > me they were fine, looked brand new. How is this > > > possible? I'm not complaining, but I certainly > > don't > > > baby the truck. How is this possible? Have any of > > you > > > had a similar experience? > > > > > > Ed > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Platinum - Watch CBS' NCAA March Madness, live on your desktop! > http://platinum.yahoo.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 06 2004 - 11:46:01 EST