Come on. I want to be able to beat the V8 Camaros.. not just run with them..
Nice thing about the older 2.5's.. they're a lot happier revved up than the
new style. Want to go faster.. just rev it higher.. that's why I keep a cat
free exhaust system. My 2.5 Dak can run almost 115MPH; which granted isn't
didly compared to my old Mopars; but for a 1/2T truck with a 4cylinder
motor.. I consider to hold it's own QUITE well.
Aaron Wyse
94 RC WS 2.5L 5spd
86 Shelby Charger Turbo
----- Original Message -----
From: "Gabriel A. Couriel" <BigGabe@fiufiji.com>
To: <dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net>
Sent: Monday, March 31, 2003 12:41 AM
Subject: DML: RE: Re: Needed: 2.5L Engine!
>
> hmm.... big block dakota... NAH! go for a normally aspirated 2.5L!!!
>
> Gabe Couriel
> http://frontpage.tripod.com/fijigabe0
>
> kinda scary to think that it's 1:41 AM, and i'm still studying...
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net
> [mailto:owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net]On Behalf Of Aaron Wyse
> Sent: Monday, March 31, 2003 1:06 AM
> To: dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net
> Subject: DML: Re: Needed: 2.5L Engine!
>
>
>
> Tom. I had a 95 and now a 94 and both of those are based off the old
2.2..
> I'm not sure if 96 uses the new style or not.. but somewhere along the
lines
> they dropped the OHC and went with a different 2.5. I'd love a turbo on
my
> 2.5. still debating to add a turbo to it; or pull it and drop in a BB.
> Aaron Wyse
> 94 RC WS 2.5L 5spd
> 86 Shelby Charger Turbo
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tom Byrne" <kerib@ptd.net>
> To: <dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net>
> Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2003 4:50 PM
> Subject: DML: Re: Re: Needed: 2.5L Engine!
>
>
> >
> > I think by 94 they used the Jeep 2.5. 1987 four cylinder Dakota's had a
> 2.2
> > and then went to the DODGE 2.5. Not sure when the went to the Jeep 2.5
but
> I
> > thought it was 96 but I could be wrong. If it is a Dodge engine I have a
> > good 2.2 in my garage. I also have a ported head the fits the Dodge
> 2.2/2.5.
> > I knew a few people who turbaned their Dodge 4 cylinders like a Shelby
and
> > run 13's I even know of a few Minivans runny into the 12's. How many of
> you
> > knew that in the late 1980's you could order a Caravan with a turbo 2.5?
> > Tom Byrne
> > 84 Charger 2.2 FSP.
> > 89 Shelby Dakota.
> > 99 Neon DOHC Coupe DSP.
> > The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings; the
> > inherent vice of socialism is the equal sharing of miseries.
> > Winston Churchill
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Aaron Wyse" <awyse@sw.rr.com>
> > To: <dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net>
> > Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2003 5:38 PM
> > Subject: DML: Re: Needed: 2.5L Engine!
> >
> >
> > >
> > > check on E-bay.. I think that's also the same 2.5L that's in the
> > Wrangler.
> > > Can anyone verify this? I saw a few of them on there earlier today.
> > > Aaron Wyse
> > > 94 RC WS 2.5L 5spd
> > > 86 Shelby Charger Turbo
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Tony Troidl" <ttroidl@bluefrognet.net>
> > > To: <dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net>
> > > Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2003 3:55 PM
> > > Subject: DML: Needed: 2.5L Engine!
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > Anyone have a 2.5L for a '97 or newer?
> > > >
> > > > the one I was saposed to get from Tom got kinda sold on me, so I'm
> stuck
> > > > without a engine again!
> > > >
> > > > HELP!!!
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Tony.
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 06 2004 - 11:46:05 EST