Jeff Durling wrote:
>Forgot about the deletion of the R/T, at least for. I didn't know about
>the clearance problems but that surprises me. I am not doubting you but
>it seems it's more cramped under the hood of the GC than the dak. I know
>the GC is due for a replacement but I didn't think that was happening
>until the following year.
>
>I agree that it will most likely not be seen since the dak would be the
>only older vehicle (besides the GC) that would be losing an engine and
>it's not really worth it to put it in unless it's easy to do. Especially
>with the possibility for a new Dak the following year.
>
>
>
They'll just have to make a special hood for the damn thing. It would be
cooler anyhow.
-- -Droo Email: 03dakotaCC4.7_4x4@comcast.net"Remember: No one has the right to touch you in your bathing suit area." -Jack
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 06 2004 - 11:46:13 EST