Bob, here's more on your specific question. Looking at Rancho's conversion
chart, and since the new shock is RS99147, it would appear the older model #
is RS9147.
Ray
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net
> [mailto:owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net]On Behalf Of RayB
> Sent: Sunday, May 11, 2003 10:17 AM
> To: dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net
> Subject: DML: RE: Rancho RS9000 Q
>
>
>
> Bob, here's what I found....
>
> 1997-01 2wd Dakota -Rear-- RS5000 = RS5147, RS9000X = RS99147
> http://www.gorancho.com/documents/shocks.pdf page 8
>
> FWIW...I still use stock length rear shocks even with a 3" drop. If you
> want a shorter Rancho shock, try looking at their specification charts and
> find a part # that is the same style but shorter.
>
> RayB
> http://www.dragtruk.com/ENTRIES/20KM1FD2KWBP.html
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > I've been searching around to try and verify an RS number
> > which is applicable for the rear of a 97 Dakota 4x2 at stock height.
> > Does anyone know if RS9248 is correct one? If not, anyone know
> > which number?
> >
> > I know that the 5-position has been superceded by a 9-position model
> > but if I can find the older model around I'd rather not pay the extra
> > for the 9-way. I just have to get the number for the 5-position.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > Bob Tom Burlington, Ont., Canada
> > '97 Dakota Sport, 4x2, CC, Flame red, 5.2L, 44RE auto., 4.56SG
> >
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 06 2004 - 11:46:19 EST