Hopefully I'm reading this wrong b/c it looks like they went from 160->190
FT# TQ and 110->130 HP... That seems a little weak to me, my V6 dynoed at
130 HP and about 180 FT# TQ just about stock with a trans that was filled to
the gills with extra fluid.... My curves looked nicer than theirs too. :-)
Is it me and that I'm reading this wrong or what? Bernd, Ray? What's the
real deal here? I've been thinking about picking this device up thru Chad
and this may have changed my mind.
-- - Josh Lowered 2000 Dakota CC 3.9L""Chris Hogan"" <chogan@logikos.com> wrote in message news:817531784725D411BB9F00508BC97CDC01177602@clavius.logikos.com... > > ...I asked for some dyno results from Superchips. Here's what they sent me for the 3.9L automatic. > > http://mywebpages.comcast.net/chogan68/Truck/Superchips.pdf > > Chris
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 06 2004 - 11:46:22 EST