I had a look at this chart, I'm guessing that since this was on a '02 3.9.
That it was bone stock.............no performance equipment.....
If this was installed on a 3.9 with an air intake, TB, headers, and a good
catback
the results may be even greater.....
Ron-
Muscletrucks.net
----- Original Message -----
From: "Josh Battles" <jbattles@bankfinancial.com>
To: <dakota-truck-moderator@bent.twistedbits.net>
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 5:22 PM
Subject: DML: Re: Superchips Dyno Results
>
> Hopefully I'm reading this wrong b/c it looks like they went from 160->190
> FT# TQ and 110->130 HP... That seems a little weak to me, my V6 dynoed at
> 130 HP and about 180 FT# TQ just about stock with a trans that was filled
to
> the gills with extra fluid.... My curves looked nicer than theirs too.
:-)
>
> Is it me and that I'm reading this wrong or what? Bernd, Ray? What's the
> real deal here? I've been thinking about picking this device up thru Chad
> and this may have changed my mind.
>
> --
> - Josh
> Lowered 2000 Dakota CC 3.9L
>
>
> ""Chris Hogan"" <chogan@logikos.com> wrote in message
> news:817531784725D411BB9F00508BC97CDC01177602@clavius.logikos.com...
> >
> > ...I asked for some dyno results from Superchips. Here's what they sent
> me for the 3.9L automatic.
> >
> > http://mywebpages.comcast.net/chogan68/Truck/Superchips.pdf
> >
> > Chris
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 06 2004 - 11:46:22 EST