What would be that different on the 02 compared to my 00?? I can't see the
stock ratings going down at all... They just seemed way low to me is all.
-- - Josh Lowered 2000 Dakota CC 3.9L""scsilverdak"" <scsilverdak@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:BAY7-DAV45hF7F3EjaV00010f5d@hotmail.com... > > I had a look at this chart, I'm guessing that since this was on a '02 3.9. > > That it was bone stock.............no performance equipment..... > > If this was installed on a 3.9 with an air intake, TB, headers, and a good > catback > the results may be even greater..... > > Ron- > Muscletrucks.net > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Josh Battles" <jbattles@bankfinancial.com> > To: <dakota-truck-moderator@bent.twistedbits.net> > Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 5:22 PM > Subject: DML: Re: Superchips Dyno Results > > > > > > Hopefully I'm reading this wrong b/c it looks like they went from 160->190 > > FT# TQ and 110->130 HP... That seems a little weak to me, my V6 dynoed at > > 130 HP and about 180 FT# TQ just about stock with a trans that was filled > to > > the gills with extra fluid.... My curves looked nicer than theirs too. > :-) > > > > Is it me and that I'm reading this wrong or what? Bernd, Ray? What's the > > real deal here? I've been thinking about picking this device up thru Chad > > and this may have changed my mind. > > > > -- > > - Josh > > Lowered 2000 Dakota CC 3.9L > > > > > > ""Chris Hogan"" <chogan@logikos.com> wrote in message > > news:817531784725D411BB9F00508BC97CDC01177602@clavius.logikos.com... > > > > > > ...I asked for some dyno results from Superchips. Here's what they sent > > me for the 3.9L automatic. > > > > > > http://mywebpages.comcast.net/chogan68/Truck/Superchips.pdf > > > > > > Chris > > > > > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 06 2004 - 11:46:22 EST