I dunno if there's really that big of a difference in that scenario. I do
know chrysler engines are all internally balanced though, so I'm not sure
how much of a difference that makes. Anyone care to elaborate?
-- - Josh Lowered 2000 Dakota CC 3.9L""BARRY OLIVER"" <DHSPA58@dhs.state.il.us> wrote in message news:see99b0a.000@mail.dhs.state.il.us... > > Uh, no, that's not what I meant. He was asking the difference between two parts, the only differences that I could see from the info given is the one that wasn't balanced was $400 cheaper. Since I have never took apart any engine more complicated than a flathead Willys, I don't know if paying for the unbalanced one and balancing it yourself [or having the shop do it for you] is worth the $400.... > > >>> jbattles@bankfinancial.com 06/13/03 09:03AM >>> > > ""BARRY OLIVER"" <DHSPA58@dhs.state.il.us> wrote in message > news:see98c30.096@mail.dhs.state.il.us... > > > > wow, $400 to balance a crank? is that worth it?? > > > > You tell me Barry... If you just spent a few thousand on a new motor, would > you mind spending $400 to balance your crank so it lasts a good long time??? > Seems worth it to me, a little pricey (I've paid less) but definately worth > it. > > -- > - Josh > Lowered 2000 Dakota CC 3.9L > > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 06 2004 - 11:46:27 EST