Re: was OT employment stuff, now: I'm sure it's time for this :-)

• Next message: Dan Kramarsky: "Re: Re: slightly offtopic question - but still related to the"
• Previous message: Bill Pitz: "Re: If not WD-40, then what?"
• In reply to: Norah Bleazard: "was OT employment stuff, now: I'm sure it's time for this :-)"
• Next in thread: jon@dakota-truck.net: "Re: was OT employment stuff, now: I'm sure it's time for this :-)"
• Reply: jon@dakota-truck.net: "Re: was OT employment stuff, now: I'm sure it's time for this :-)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

On Thu, 10 Jul 2003 23:09:31 -0400, norah.dml@bleazard.net ("Norah
Bleazard") wrote:

[snipped a whole lot of BS! just kidding :-) ]

>and last but not least... 454 people flaming me for posting this :-)
>
>Sorry guys but I just couldn't resist. And please take it in the spirit is
>was intended..... A JOKE!!! :-)))))))

I was thinking about some of these things too -- no one has complained
about this long OT thread. I think it's because it's a thread that
just about everyone can (and has) contributed to because we all know
(hopefully) a little bit about what we do for a living.

-Bill

• Next message: Dan Kramarsky: "Re: Re: slightly offtopic question - but still related to the"
• Previous message: Bill Pitz: "Re: If not WD-40, then what?"
• In reply to: Norah Bleazard: "was OT employment stuff, now: I'm sure it's time for this :-)"
• Next in thread: jon@dakota-truck.net: "Re: was OT employment stuff, now: I'm sure it's time for this :-)"
• Reply: jon@dakota-truck.net: "Re: was OT employment stuff, now: I'm sure it's time for this :-)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 06 2004 - 11:46:36 EST