The two we dyno'd had over 2000 miles on them...no difference.
- Bernd
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net
[mailto:owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net] On Behalf Of
scsilverdak
Sent: Sunday, July 20, 2003 8:32 PM
To: dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net
Subject: DML: Re: RE: Re: check this- rear wheel dyno of stock 5.7
A friend of mine that was at Carlilse had his '03 HEMI Ram 1500 RC 2WD
dyno'ed that same weekend and his pretty much pulled the same number.
His only had about 600 miles total on the odometer, so I suspect that
after a few thousand miles of run in time it may do better......
I told him the same thing Bernd just said
about this one.........
So yours isn't the only Hemi with a lower than expected RWHP ##, this
seems to be about normal for a stock Hemi.....
Ron-
Performance consultant
Muscletrucks.net
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bernd D. Ratsch" <bernd@texas.net>
To: <dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net>
Sent: Sunday, July 20, 2003 9:10 PM
Subject: DML: RE: Re: check this- rear wheel dyno of stock 5.7
>
> Most of it is from the torque converter. It has a .030" clearance
> "slop" to cover DC's butt on the 7/70 warranty (slips a bunch). The
> other part is the fly-by-wire system but you can count on at least a
> 32-33% driveline loss.
>
> APS Precision has finished their Hemi converters with the proper math
> used to make the factory PCM happy.
>
> - Bernd
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net
> [mailto:owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net] On Behalf Of Jim
> Miller WB5OXQ
> Sent: Sunday, July 20, 2003 2:16 PM
> To: dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net
> Subject: DML: Re: check this- rear wheel dyno of stock 5.7
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jim Miller WB5OXQ" <wb5oxq@grandecom.net>
> To: <dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net>
> Sent: Sunday, July 20, 2003 12:27 PM
> Subject: DML: check this- rear wheel dyno of stock 5.7
>
>
> >
> > Attn Bernd. What can done to improve this? This is nearly 100 hp
> > loss or
> over 30% They were assuming 22% drive train loss but this is worse.
> They are also assuming that Dodge overrated the hemi's hp rating.
> Could this all be due to the torque converter loss problem you told
> about in a previous post? They also state a poor a/f ratio being a
> problem.. Software in the computer or mods to O2 or mat sensor help
> this?
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Henry LaViers" <hl4@worldnet.att.net>
> > To: "dirt" <dirt@mailman.xmission.com>
> > Sent: Sunday, July 20, 2003 6:15 AM
> > Subject: [DiRT] rear wheel dyno of stock 5.7
> >
> >
> > > http://dynoperformance.com/search_details.php?ID=488
> > >
> > > aaa
> > >
> > >
> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > Send your posts to:
> > > DiRT@mailman.xmission.com
> > > To subscribe/unsubscribe or change your membership:
> > > http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dirt
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 06 2004 - 11:46:38 EST