Ok,........that clarifies that........
My experience with the NEW Hemi is very little at this point.........
Hell......I've only seen three so far
Ron-
Performance consultant
Muscletrucks.net
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bernd D. Ratsch" <bernd@texas.net>
To: <dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net>
Sent: Sunday, July 20, 2003 10:29 PM
Subject: DML: RE: Re: RE: Re: check this- rear wheel dyno of stock 5.7
>
> The two we dyno'd had over 2000 miles on them...no difference.
>
> - Bernd
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net
> [mailto:owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net] On Behalf Of
> scsilverdak
> Sent: Sunday, July 20, 2003 8:32 PM
> To: dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net
> Subject: DML: Re: RE: Re: check this- rear wheel dyno of stock 5.7
>
>
>
> A friend of mine that was at Carlilse had his '03 HEMI Ram 1500 RC 2WD
> dyno'ed that same weekend and his pretty much pulled the same number.
>
> His only had about 600 miles total on the odometer, so I suspect that
> after a few thousand miles of run in time it may do better......
>
> I told him the same thing Bernd just said
> about this one.........
>
> So yours isn't the only Hemi with a lower than expected RWHP ##, this
> seems to be about normal for a stock Hemi.....
>
> Ron-
> Performance consultant
> Muscletrucks.net
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Bernd D. Ratsch" <bernd@texas.net>
> To: <dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net>
> Sent: Sunday, July 20, 2003 9:10 PM
> Subject: DML: RE: Re: check this- rear wheel dyno of stock 5.7
>
>
> >
> > Most of it is from the torque converter. It has a .030" clearance
> > "slop" to cover DC's butt on the 7/70 warranty (slips a bunch). The
> > other part is the fly-by-wire system but you can count on at least a
> > 32-33% driveline loss.
> >
> > APS Precision has finished their Hemi converters with the proper math
> > used to make the factory PCM happy.
> >
> > - Bernd
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net
> > [mailto:owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net] On Behalf Of Jim
> > Miller WB5OXQ
> > Sent: Sunday, July 20, 2003 2:16 PM
> > To: dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net
> > Subject: DML: Re: check this- rear wheel dyno of stock 5.7
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Jim Miller WB5OXQ" <wb5oxq@grandecom.net>
> > To: <dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net>
> > Sent: Sunday, July 20, 2003 12:27 PM
> > Subject: DML: check this- rear wheel dyno of stock 5.7
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Attn Bernd. What can done to improve this? This is nearly 100 hp
> > > loss or
> > over 30% They were assuming 22% drive train loss but this is worse.
> > They are also assuming that Dodge overrated the hemi's hp rating.
> > Could this all be due to the torque converter loss problem you told
> > about in a previous post? They also state a poor a/f ratio being a
> > problem.. Software in the computer or mods to O2 or mat sensor help
> > this?
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Henry LaViers" <hl4@worldnet.att.net>
> > > To: "dirt" <dirt@mailman.xmission.com>
> > > Sent: Sunday, July 20, 2003 6:15 AM
> > > Subject: [DiRT] rear wheel dyno of stock 5.7
> > >
> > >
> > > > http://dynoperformance.com/search_details.php?ID=488
> > > >
> > > > aaa
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > > Send your posts to:
> > > > DiRT@mailman.xmission.com
> > > > To subscribe/unsubscribe or change your membership:
> > > > http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dirt
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 06 2004 - 11:46:38 EST