Michael Maskalans <mike-lists@tepidcola.com> wrote:
: On Wednesday, July 30, 2003, at 05:30 PM, Neil W. Bellenger wrote:
:> On Behalf Of jon@dakota-truck.net
:>> There are aluminum trailers available, but I think the idea behind
:>> those is more weight reduction than anything else, so I wouldn't be
:>> surprised if an aluminum trailer was more expensive than steel.
:>
:> I'm convinced they're more expensive. However, I would never consider
:> an
:> aluminum trailer in our area due to the salt on the roads. Regardless
:> of
:> alloys, anodizing, coatings, I think it would look terrible within two
:> years
:> and be structurally unsound in five years.
: I think you meant you'd never consider steel. at least I hope that's
: what you meant. If so, I agree completely. (If you meant what you
: said, I'm deeply confused and fear for your sanity =) )
Although steel will rust, it is usually thick, it takes a long time
for rust to compromise the integrity of the metal and there are many
different ways to fight it. Aluminum, although it does not rust, *will*
corrode. I think that what Neil was saying is that corrosion will affect
the lighter constructed aluminum trailer much more quickly than rust
would affect a steel trailer.
---Jon-
.---- Jon Steiger ------ jon@dakota-truck.net or jon@jonsteiger.com ------. | I'm the: AOPA, DoD, EAA, NMA, NRA, SPA, USUA. Rec & UL Pilot - SEL | | 70 Cuda, 90 Dak 'vert, 92 Ram 4x4, 96 Dak, 96 Intruder 1400, 96 FireFly | `------------------------------------------ http://www.jonsteiger.com ----'
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 06 2004 - 11:46:40 EST