Re: injectors

From: Chad Evans (hemidak@msn.com)
Date: Thu Aug 21 2003 - 17:30:51 EDT


ok I hear yah.
I have one more goodie that I want to add. but I think that getting the
stroker done first will take most of my money.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Bob Mankin" <bob@coralfarms.com>
To: <dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net>
Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2003 10:29 AM
Subject: RE: DML: injectors

>
> I wouldn't recommend the 24# on the stroker either without some PCM tweaks
> or some type of aux fuel control. Strokers don't bump the BSFC by a simple
> 25%. In open loop it's likely to be pig fat(ie. cold idle and WOT). On a
> new
> motor you risk washing out the rings.
>
> Bob
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net
> > [mailto:owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net]On Behalf Of
> > Chad Evans
> > Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2003 7:30 AM
> > To: dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net
> > Subject: Re: DML: injectors
> >
> >
> >
> > I put 24's in my 5.2
> > didn't make it idle bad. but it would make yah cry if you
> > stood behind it.
> > lol
> > needless they wont go back in till I get my 390 stroker done.
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Tony Cellana" <acellan1@tampabay.rr.com>
> > To: <dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net>
> > Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2003 6:28 AM
> > Subject: Re: DML: injectors
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Larger injectors are NOT needed until you get to the point
> > of leaning out
> > > the stockers. Too large an injector without tweaking the
> > PCM will cause
> > > idle issues and such.
> > >
> > > TonyC
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Chris Reck <creck@insightbb.com>
> > > To: dakota-truck-moderator@bent.twistedbits.net
> > > <dakota-truck-moderator@bent.twistedbits.net>
> > > Date: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 10:08 PM
> > > Subject: Re: DML: injectors
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > >Anyone know what the best bet is for a 99 V6? I'm up to
> > 70k and thinking
> > > >about keeping this truck much longer and want to improve
> > my performance
> > > >and
> > > >mileage. I'm looking for the best of both worlds, as I
> > don't expect the
> > > 4x4
> > > >to be doing autocross...
> > > >
> > > >Thanks!
> > > >
> > > >Chris Reck
> > > >Bloomington, IL
> > > >
> > > >'99 Dakota Sport + CC 4x4 V6 (Deep Amethyst)
> > > >Shaved and polished V8 TB, Autolite 3923, 7.5mm Bosch plug
> > wires, Custom
> > > K&N
> > > >6x9 air intake,
> > > >Jet Stage 1 Chip, Rancho RSX shocks, Pioneer full audio system, BF
> > > >Goodrich
> > > >32x11.5r15 T/A KO tires
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >""Tony Cellana"" <acellan1@tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message
> > > >news:014301c3677d$b3f29ba0$585e2241@a.tampabay.rr.com...
> > > >>
> > > >> And the difference in impedence affects them how?
> > > >> TonyC
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> -----Original Message-----
> > > >> From: Bernd D. Ratsch <bernd@texas.net>
> > > >> To: dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net <dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net>
> > > >> Date: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 8:44 PM
> > > >> Subject: RE: DML: RE: RE: injectors
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> >
> > > >> >Not mistaken:
> > > >> >
> > > >> >Impedance
> > > >> >Factory Injectors: 12 +/-1.2ohms (Factory Spec - '97-'04)
> > > >> >FMS "High Flow": 14.3-14.5ohms
> > > >> >Design-III: 15.2-15.3
> > > >> >
> > > >> >While you can run different impedance injectors, going
> > to far from
> > > >> >factory will cause issues. We tested the Design-III's
> > (Orange) on my
> > > >> >'97, a '98 5.2L, and on a '99 R/T. All of them showed the same
> > > >> >problem
> > > >> >- worked with Bruce Holt on that as well as he didn't
> > know (at that
> > > >> >time) if they would work properly or not. (This was
> > over 1 year ago.)
> > > >> >
> > > >> >- Bernd
> > > >> >
> > > >> >-----Original Message-----
> > > >> >From: owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net
> > > >> >[mailto:owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net] On
> > Behalf Of Bob
> > > >> >Mankin
> > > >> >Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 10:15 AM
> > > >> >To: dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net
> > > >> >Subject: RE: DML: RE: RE: injectors
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> >I think you're mistaken. If anything I would expect the
> > Design III to
> > > >> >perform better. Better atomization and resulting
> > mileage. Impedance is
> > > >> >close enough. If you want to argue that it's not exact
> > match then your
> > > >> >suggestion of Accel or FMS won't fly since they are not an exact
> > > >> >impedance match either.
> > > >> >
> > > >> >Bob
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 06 2004 - 11:46:48 EST