The 3.9 V6 is similar in construction to the 5.2 V8 (Dak and Ram). If
you know your way around the 5.2, you'll be on familiar teritory with
the 3.9.
As for 5.2 vs. 3.9, power is obvious. If your hard on the go pedal the
milage difference will be negligible. But if you drive consertivily
you'll probably see 17 in the 3.9 vs. 14 in the 5.2.
If you've got the extra cash, check around for a similar 2000+ dakota in
the 4.7L V8. They're old enough now to have the price come down.
You'll pretty much get the milage of the 3.9 with the power+ of the 5.2.
Jay W
505/287 Dakota
Mike Goodell wrote:
> I stopped and looked at a 98 sport clubcab,
> V6 auto 4x4. I don't know the mileage due to the
> stealer being closed and not being able to see
> the odometer. overall it looks real good, no obvious
> body repairs under carriage looked good, no offroad damage
> visible, (no scrapes or smashes evident).
>
> As this might be my first Dak, is there anything I should
> look for or avoid? I previously owned a 96 Ram 15002wd
> followed by an 01 Ram 1500 4x4, both had the 5.2 and 5 speed
> so I am somewhat familiar with Dodge products but not the V6
> or the auto box.
> So tell me should I look closer or run away? My Land Rover
> Discovery has been fun, but I miss having a truck, and I would
> prefer a Dodge. I don't need a full size anymore hence
> looking for a Dak.
>
> Thanks,
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 06 2004 - 11:46:55 EST