RE: Re: RE: K&N -- good people, good product.

From: Bernd D. Ratsch (bernd@texas.net)
Date: Sat Oct 11 2003 - 10:18:56 EDT


That's one of the reasons.

- Bernd

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net
[mailto:owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net] On Behalf Of Chad Evans
Sent: Saturday, October 11, 2003 12:02 AM
To: dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net
Subject: Re: DML: Re: RE: K&N -- good people, good product.

Is this why mopar got rid of the cold air intake from k&m from their
perf
line ?

----- Original Message -----
From: "Bernd D. Ratsch" <bernd@texas.net>
To: <dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net>
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 7:20 PM
Subject: RE: DML: Re: RE: K&N -- good people, good product.

>
> In the case of the K&N filters on the Cummins engines...proof is
> already there with documentation to back it up. Warranty is void - no

> recourse available.
>
> - Bernd
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net
> [mailto:owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net] On Behalf Of andy
> levy
> Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 7:16 PM
> To: dakota-truck-moderator@bent.twistedbits.net
> Subject: Re: DML: Re: RE: K&N -- good people, good product.
>
>
>
> Tubamirbls@aol.com wrote:
>
> > Any dealer can refuse to acknowledge warranty coverage on any part
> > of the vehicle for whatever excuse he wishes to make. That's why
> > Chrysler
> has an
> > appeals procedure in place for the customer to seek redress.
>
> Law trumps Chrysler. The burden of *proof* rests on Chrysler's
> shoulders when refusing warranty coverage for "any excuse he wishes to

> make."
>
> --
> -andy
>
> http://home.twcny.rr.com/andylevy/dakota - andy-dml@levyclan.us
> --------------------------------------------
> "Whatever Adam does, do the opposite and you'll be fine"
> -Bob Tom
> --------------------------------------------
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 06 2004 - 11:47:03 EST