Re: Re: RE: K&N -- good people, good product.

From: Chad Evans (hemidak@msn.com)
Date: Sat Oct 11 2003 - 01:02:29 EDT


Is this why mopar got rid of the cold air intake from k&m from their perf
line ?

----- Original Message -----
From: "Bernd D. Ratsch" <bernd@texas.net>
To: <dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net>
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 7:20 PM
Subject: RE: DML: Re: RE: K&N -- good people, good product.

>
> In the case of the K&N filters on the Cummins engines...proof is already
> there with documentation to back it up. Warranty is void - no recourse
> available.
>
> - Bernd
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net
> [mailto:owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net] On Behalf Of andy levy
> Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 7:16 PM
> To: dakota-truck-moderator@bent.twistedbits.net
> Subject: Re: DML: Re: RE: K&N -- good people, good product.
>
>
>
> Tubamirbls@aol.com wrote:
>
> > Any dealer can refuse to acknowledge warranty coverage on any part of
> > the
> > vehicle for whatever excuse he wishes to make. That's why Chrysler
> has an
> > appeals procedure in place for the customer to seek redress.
>
> Law trumps Chrysler. The burden of *proof* rests on Chrysler's
> shoulders when refusing warranty coverage for "any excuse he wishes to
> make."
>
> --
> -andy
>
> http://home.twcny.rr.com/andylevy/dakota - andy-dml@levyclan.us
> --------------------------------------------
> "Whatever Adam does, do the opposite and you'll be fine"
> -Bob Tom
> --------------------------------------------
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 06 2004 - 11:47:03 EST