Gen-II vs. Gen-III. Don't know why, but the Gen-II's are built a little bit
better (ok...don't get a big ego over that comment though). ;)
- Bernd
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net
[mailto:owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net] On Behalf Of SnoViper
Sent: Saturday, November 01, 2003 3:17 PM
To: dakota-truck-moderator@bent.twistedbits.net
Subject: DML: Re: Time to join the "ball joint " club.
I have a Gen II with 178,000 miles and still running the original ball
joints. I wonder what changed.
Gary
""Mallett, Donald B"" <Donald.Mallett@BNSF.com> wrote in message
news:0F45A7A5E62CD211B8CC0008C7A402F013BCD87D@ftwntexmp002.bnsf.com...
>
> I knew it was a matter of time or mileage (56,600). The Dak is going
> in Monday to get the ball joints replaced. So what's the latest in way
> of
part
> numbers, brands and pricing for the ball joints? Any with a lifetime
> warranty? Grease fitting?
>
> I know about the soon to be (maybe) recall on them. I would rather
> deal
with
> them once then every 50,000 miles. At least cost wise for the parts.
> I'm a week behind in reading the DML digest, But did skim them about
> the ball joint issues. All paper work and old parts will be saved.
>
> Thanks for any info!!!!
>
> *-------------------------------Y2KOTA-------------------------------*
> Don Mallett
> Y2K QC 4.7L Auto SLT+ 4x2
> http://www.y2kota.us
> *----------------You have no rights if you don't know your
> rights...-----------------*
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 06 2004 - 11:47:07 EST