steve preston wrote:
> I just caught the tail-end of it,but is it true that
> Bernd said: "I cannot for the life of me figure out
> why anyone would buy a Gen.III Dak,which fall apart
> and are useless pieces of junk,when they should have
> Gen.II`s,which are 'built better' and last far longer
> and are not prone to have all the problems that
> Gen.III`s have"? Did he really say that? :) Steve P.
I don't think he said that. He did say " Don't know why, but the
Gen-II's are built a little bit better" but I have no idea where you got
the rest from. Unless you saw something other than this post?
http://archives.dakota-truck.net/0311/0037.html
-- -andyhttp://home.twcny.rr.com/andylevy/dakota - andy-dml@levyclan.us -------------------------------------------- "Whatever Adam does, do the opposite and you'll be fine" -Bob Tom --------------------------------------------
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 06 2004 - 11:47:07 EST