[ The following text is in the "iso-8859-1" character set. ]
[ Your display is set for the "US-ASCII" character set. ]
[ Some characters may be displayed incorrectly. ]
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net
[mailto:owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net]On Behalf Of andy levy
Sent: Monday, December 29, 2003 7:01 AM
To: dakota-truck-moderator@bent.twistedbits.net
Subject: Re: DML: Re: t-case selection.....
< On Dec 28, 2003, at 2:31 PM, Jon Smith wrote: The 242 - 231 swap is a
popular one among the WJ crowd, since the
242's VC can be quite fragile for offroading. >
<WJ = older Grand Cherokee ('93-'97)
VC = Viscous Coupling>
This makes me wonder if there are t-cases using the NV242 designation that
have significantly different internals.
The ones on '98 - '99 Daks don't have a viscous coupling.
You're right about the usage, Andy. The differential set in the 242's that
we have would be locked by shifting it from "full time" to "part time" but I
can't speak to the strength of all the pieces/parts.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 06 2004 - 11:47:13 EST