Re: Speaker Survey, Gen I and Gen II's

From: Mike Meyerhoff (mike@mypants.org)
Date: Tue Jan 06 2004 - 11:29:24 EST


I've been happy with my Diamond M3 6 1/2" components. You may as well go
with 6 1/2s... the stock hole is a goofy shape uses a plastic adapter plate
(that isn't very sturdy). To fit the bigger driver you have to make a
different plate which is a good thing.
mm

----- Original Message -----
From: "Josh Battles" <jbattles@bankfinancial.com>
To: <dakota-truck-moderator@bent.twistedbits.net>
Sent: Saturday, January 03, 2004 9:14 AM
Subject: Re: DML: Speaker Survey, Gen I and Gen II's

>
> ""Biff Byrum"" <bbyrum9@foothill.net> wrote in message
> >
> > Josh: Can you hear that choo-choo train horn
> > coming at you? Such class!! Too bad there are
> > some of us in the low rent district. That's a lot of
> > bread, but those are about the best ever.
>
> It's not the door speakers that keep the choo-choo train horns inaudible
to
> me. The 10" brahma feeding off of 1000w that sits in my backseat does
that.
>
> As far as sound quality goes, the RF coaxials are nice, but every day I
kick
> myself for selling the set of Focal polykevlar components that I had all
> around. I've never heard a better sounding speaker for an automotive
> application. They handled the max output of my amps flawlessly and
without
> distortion. They were magnificent. Very cost prohibitive though, and I
> ended up having to sell them to pay my $1000 colision deductable.
>
> --
> - Josh
> Lowered 2000 Dakota CC 3.9L
> www.geocities.com/lenny187/dakota.html
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Feb 01 2004 - 16:29:48 EST