That'll get ya' a ticket in the state of PA VERY QUICKLY! and most other
states as well!
Sometimes these cosmetic enhancements are not worth the trouble due to the
FINES and other problems they can cause!
Ron-
01'Dakota Sport 3.9 4WD
www.scsilverdak.1colony.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Josh Battles" <jbattles@bankfinancial.com>
To: <dakota-truck-moderator@bent.twistedbits.net>
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2004 3:27 PM
Subject: Re: DML: Re: pros and cons
>
> <jon@dakota-truck.net> wrote in message
> news:c3ve0d$h4l$1@bent.twistedbits.net...
> >
> > I actually have a can of the stuff on a shelf in the shop.
> > I ordered it something like 7 years ago now and never got
> > around to using it. :-) I ended up getting some tail
> > light covers instead from Mike Clark who got 'em from Jason
> > Bleazard who didn't like them on the used '95 he purchased
> > way back when. :-)
> >
> > Anyway, unfortunately since I have never used it, I can't
> > tell you how it looks. :-) Maybe one of these days I'll
> > actually use it for something - 3rd brake light on the Dak or
> > Ram maybe.
> >
> > Wasn't that helpful? ;-)
> >
> > --
> > -Jon-
>
> OOH, that's a good idea. I'd have never thought about using something
> like
> that on the third brake light. Might look slick on a black truck. The
> third brake lights on the rams are nice though...clear lenses and they
> light
> up red. Now that's my kind of taillights.
>
> I actually know someone who had his taillights painted with the body color
> of his car (black 03 mustang) and they came out great! He waxes them just
> like the rest of the body. They're just about the same brightness at
> night,
> and only slighly dimmer during the daytime. The only drawback is that you
> really can't see them illuminate when they're in full sun. :eek:
>
> --
> - Josh
> Lowered 2000 Dakota CC 3.9L
> www.geocities.com/lenny187/dakota.html
> www.omg-stfu.com
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Feb 16 2008 - 21:39:22 EST