That was the main reason I decided to just go with new leafs. (not to
mention that Jayson sold me his old ones for a song) It would have been
nice to retain my total cargo capabilities by reusing my factory HD leafs,
but such is life.
-- - Josh Lowered 2000 Dakota CC 3.9L www.geocities.com/lenny187/dakota.html www.omg-stfu.com""Tony Cellana"" <acellan1@tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message news:075001c42c98$0807da40$f95f2241@a.tampabay.rr.com... > > For autocross, I agree. From an install standpoint, the relocated hangars > are a MAJOR pain. Maintenance (removing springs) is also a bit more work. > > TonyC > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Josh Battles <jbattles@bankfinancial.com> > To: dakota-truck-moderator@bent.twistedbits.net > <dakota-truck-moderator@bent.twistedbits.net> > Date: Tuesday, April 27, 2004 4:29 PM > Subject: DML: Re: Re: Suspension Q's > > > > > >""Tony Cellana"" <acellan1@tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message > >> > >> Out back, you can add a block on top of the axle for additional drop. Go > >> with STEEL ones!!! The cheaper aluminum ones are more prone to cracking. > > > >Why not just use a 2" shackle/hanger kit? That way you'd be able to retain > >the hotchkis leaves that are apparently what Jayson's looking for, and not > >have to worry about blocks cracking or whatnot. Plus, from a stability > >standpoint, the blocks might not be the best alternative for someone who > >competitively autocrosses. > > > >-- > >- Josh > >Lowered 2000 Dakota CC 3.9L > >www.geocities.com/lenny187/dakota.html > >www.omg-stfu.com > > > > > > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat May 01 2004 - 12:00:18 EDT